patients per provider, per day
More visits without longer days.
on average; up to 11 in some settings
AI drafts the documentation, and a US-based Remote Healthcare Assistant owns the coding, orders, and follow-through across the whole patient journey.
Trusted by Healthcare Organizations Nationwide
























The note was never the hard part. Everything around the visit still lands on your providers, so they chart at 10pm, your best people burn out, and earned revenue leaks.
Scribe-X fixes the whole visit.
AI plus a Remote Healthcare Assistant own the entire patient journey, not just the note.
The platform works before, during, and after every encounter, so nothing about the visit is left undone.
Chart prep, problem review, and open care gaps, ready before the patient walks in.

The note, the orders, and live human support, captured as the visit happens.

Coding completeness, HCC capture, care gaps, and documentation quality, surfaced and monitored.

Coming next: inbox management, care coordination, and operations intelligence.
Three solutions along one spectrum, from self-directed AI to a real-time remote medical scribe. Mix them across your providers, under a single agreement, to reach the outcomes your organization needs.
AI drafts documentation from the encounter, and your team reviews and finalizes it. The lightest starting point, for teams ready to own their own review.
Mostly AI
AI drafts every note, and a Remote Healthcare Assistant reviews it before your provider ever sees it. Orders, referrals, and revenue depth layer on when you are ready.
AI + human
A remote medical scribe documents live in the visit, with pre-visit, revenue, and quality all carried. The full journey, so your provider keeps the medicine.
Human-led
Start anywhere on the spectrum, and grow into more as your team is ready. Let's talk →
Enterprise-ready and low-lift to adopt, with the safeguards decision-makers ask about handled before the first encounter.
Built around HIPAA-compliant workflows, end to end.
Encryption in transit (DTLS/SRTP, TLS over 443) and at rest.
Access is scoped by role across the platform.
User and administrator activity logging for audit.
No EHR integration required for the core transition, and no customer-side servers or installs.
Hosted on AWS, so there's nothing to run or maintain on your side.
Documentation is not a single-vendor decision. Here is how the alternatives compare, and where each one leaves your providers exposed.
The appeal
Fast to start, low cost, and the note drafts itself.
The catch
Your provider is the human in the loop, reviewing every note and carrying the risk. It stops at the note, so chart prep, coding, orders, and follow-ups stay on their plate.
The appeal
Bundled into the system your team already knows, with nothing new to buy.
The catch
It is still AI drafting a note, with no human accountability before your provider signs and little depth beyond the encounter.
The appeal
Real human help at a low hourly rate.
The catch
Patient data leaves the country, quality and continuity swing with turnover, and no AI is doing the heavy lifting. You still manage the relationship.
The appeal
Full control, your own people, on your terms.
The catch
You own the recruiting, training, turnover, and coverage gaps. It is expensive to sustain and hard to scale.
AI carries the volume and a US-based human carries the judgment, across the whole visit.
We answer all five in writing, and we would encourage you to ask everyone else too.
Providers feel the difference first. Set Pulse, Assist, and Live across your team to reach the results your organization needs, on one platform configured to your practice.
patients per provider, per day
More visits without longer days.
on average; up to 11 in some settings
faster days to close
Revenue lands sooner.
provider satisfaction
A clear jump in how providers rate their day.
Less burnout, stronger retention.
more level-of-service coding captured
better HCC risk capture
Source: Scribe-X client averages.
With the work around the visit handled, providers get to be present with their patients again. Here it is, in their words.
Life-changing. From a work-life balance perspective, this has worked great. I walk out of here and my charts are done.
Four quick questions. See where your practice is losing time and revenue, and which solution fits, before you ever talk to us.
Question 1 of 4
The questions clinical and IT leaders ask us most, answered straight.
Native AI generates a note. Scribe-X supports the full visit: chart prep before, human quality review during, and follow-up after, tailored to how each provider works. That's where documentation problems actually live.
Built-in tools handle the encounter for providers who use them. They don't prep the chart, adapt to individual workflows, or support providers who won't drive the technology themselves. Scribe-X covers what happens around the note.
AI accelerates documentation across the encounter. Scribe-X leads with human expertise, so every provider gets support tailored to how they work, not just a configured tool. The result is documentation that's accurate, complete, and built around the outcomes that matter to your organization.
Most organizations are live within a few weeks of contract signing. Your onboarding contact walks through the process before anything is signed, with timeline and go-live specifics outlined upfront so there are no surprises on go-live day.
Scribe-X works with all major EHR platforms. No integration is required for most solutions. Scribe-X learns your specific platform and workflows, not a generic setup, and compatibility and any edge cases are confirmed during discovery before anything is signed.
Most implementations require standard EHR access provisioning and a BAA review. Scribe-X handles the setup process end to end. IT gets looped in where needed, not asked to carry the project.
Scribe-X scales from a single clinic to a multi-site health system. The right support model depends on your provider mix, workflows, and how much you need Scribe-X to own. Your contact scopes the right fit during discovery.
On average, clients see 1.9 more patients per provider per day, 45% faster days to close, and a 30-point improvement in provider satisfaction. Scribe-X can build a tailored ROI analysis to ensure the program is revenue-generating, not a cost center.
Yes. Scribe-X executes a BAA before any provider encounter. The platform is built with HIPAA-compliant controls: encrypted in transit and at rest, with role-based access and audit logging. Detailed security documentation is available on request.
Your account team stays active after go-live, monitoring performance, supporting slower-to-adapt providers, and flagging issues early. We start from your definition of success and work backwards. If something isn't working, you have a defined contact path, not a ticket queue.
Still have questions? Book a meeting →